More prop 8. nonsense.

This was the last thing I wrote about prop-8. After that I was sort of done. Sure, we could all scream at a wall, but it was really just wait-and-see with the supreme court. Would they or wouldn't they?

Today, the court announced it would uphold the ban, but not dissolve the marriages any of the same-sex marriage that took place before Prop 8 took affect.

I'll forgo saying how utterly dumb this seems and instead say this; The ruling keeps existing same-sex marriages on the books, and that's good for precedence, right? But it means we're back to the electorate (the will of the people) and no doubt both sides will be raging come the next election cycle.

Mike Oz has has info on some stuff happening now.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <b> <em> <i> <strong> <u> <strike> <p> <br> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Youtube and google video links are automatically converted into embedded videos.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is used to prevent spam submissions. All letters are lowercase
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.
Advertisement
Famous Contests